A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning future neighbours over the development of the wall at a coastal website inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide awareness adhering to an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household residence at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of organizing breaches, environmental issues, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Occasions report about René Collier plus the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has progressed right into a hugely publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design is effective at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a firm director respectively, seek to create their family property. The situation is now emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, exactly where growth pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of founded residents. In accordance with the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being constructed by their potential neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted less than planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both residents of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their scheduling permission by developing a wall further than the boundaries of their site, leading to an encroachment on a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, therefore spots are subject to rigorous controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have lasting ecological effects, specifically in the sensitive coastal surroundings including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, and that is partially created, is in the proper position. Their authorized workforce has characterised the action as an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding to be able to maintain their check out, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal arranging disputes, in which sights of The ocean are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable endeavours because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Situations. In one account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-substantial water in the course of a storm to photograph the site Irish Periods, an image that has since develop into emblematic of the intensity on the dispute. These steps weren't just symbolic; they were being meant to Collect Visible proof on the wall’s position relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning within the sea Irish Occasions noted, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the drinking water in the course of significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site became The most hanging descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that these steps were being cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall prolonged into a location influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up lined intimately through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to comprehend the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard further more submissions on no matter whether interim orders should be granted to halt building pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key second inside the lawful timeline.
In the Main from the dispute is a disagreement above boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain that the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accredited and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has become described as meticulous in his examination of arranging files, maps, and circumstances hooked up to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is inspired by problem for environmental defense and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving a private see, insisting rather that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they may have explained their very long-standing link to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few simply just looking to establish a household household in accordance Using the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Distinctive Space of Conservation and say that each one performs have already been performed dependant on Qualified tips and accepted plans. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into The ocean throughout a storm, do not change the underlying info.
The situation has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute over development of wall at coastal website happens to be a shorthand description for any condition that a lot of observers see as significantly frequent. As sea concentrations rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation concerning non-public land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is now more contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier noted that the businessman had Earlier been involved in community advocacy on preparing and environmental problems, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from very distinctive Specialist backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-significant water throughout a storm to photograph the website Irish Situations and René Collier waded by waist-substantial drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both the Bodily reality of your coastline along with the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an excessive method.
As the High Court proceedings continue, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom need to identify if the wall as created complies with setting up permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and arranging circumstances. Yet the human aspect remains central: neighbours who should Dwell along with one another long once the lawful prices are actually paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design functions at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the situation lengthen outside of that address. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the significance of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when elementary issues like environmental protection and house rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains an area of normal attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of the dispute stands partially developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal issues. No matter if it'll ultimately be altered, removed, or accomplished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely carry on to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most carefully viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.